Monday, January 29, 2024

WEEK 2

WEEK 2

GOOD MORNING!

IMPORTANT: 

1. I wasn't clear in that first post about recording your answers for exercises. I do need to see your work, so this week I've included those instructions with the assignments. "Record" means write out your answers in the doc as you're working. "Post" means give me your score (label it and put it somewhere I can see it easily).

2. The essay grade always reflects where I think you are in the process. So a first draft typically will be scored in the 50-70 range. That means you're 50-70% on your way to the final draft. In other words, don't freak out; it's a process.


Your work for this week... 

1. Revise the helmet law essay from last week. Yes, you may use (and maybe you should use) the usual word processing helps like grammar review and spell check. 


2. ACT q set #2 - take 10-15 minutes to complete it then go here for review. For each wrong answer write out an explanation on why you got it wrong. Record your answers in the doc and post your score.


3. Watch this semicolon and colon video.  Complete Review C on .783 and Posttest A on .784. For both exercises EXPLAIN WHY you're using the punctuation. Record your answers in the doc and post your score. (See #4 below for answers)


4. Watch this video for review/corrections of exercises from #3 and #4.


5.  LBGB work. Our work in LBGB for this course will involve 1) reviewing the big ideas (I won't make you re-read entire chapters); and 2) practicing the definitions and Style & Usage items that we skipped in HSW1. 

This week we'll look at chapter 1. Here's your work:

A. Conjunctions: define the three types and write an original sentence for each. 

B. Define conjunctive adverb. Write three sentences (note the punctuation pattern in my examples!) using three different CAs. Here are a few to choose from: 

in addition, accordingly, furthermore, moreover, on the other hand, similarly, also, hence, namely, still, anyway, however, nevertheless, then, in fact, besides, incidentally, next, thereafter, certainly, indeed, nonetheless, therefore, consequently, instead, now, thus, finally, likewise, otherwise, undoubtedly, further, meanwhile

Make sure the word you're using is WORKING as a conjunctive adverb. Many of the words in this list can be used as other parts of speech.

C. Explain the difference between these pairs and use each correctly in a sentence: 

    all together / altogether
    ___ and I  / ___ and me. 


6. Watch this video on the perusasive essay. This is how the old ACT essays were set up, so I'll refer to it that way. Our purpose is just to see the structure of a persuasive essay. 

There's about a minute missing that talks about the first body paragraph. Sorry - just pause it at that point and read the screen carefully. Also, at the end of the video I mention a gender-separated classrooms essay. IGNORE IT. This was a video I made a couple of years ago, and we started out with a different topic. We'll be doing the gender essay this week. Just pay attention to how a persuasive essay is set up. 

Also, though I don't mention this in the video (Yes, I need to just make a new video), you need to acknowledge a counter-argument, an argument from the opposing side, and then refute it (i.e, take the opposition's best argument and knock it down). I used to teach that you could include this idea anywhere in the essay, but I've since decided that making the counter-argument and knock down its own body paragraph is more effective. Here's how such a paragraph might look for the pop prompt you just watched:

Some may argue that pop consumption is a public health issue, similar to the safety of drinking water, and therefore the government has a duty to enact laws like this [That's the counter-argument. What follows is the knock down]. But that simplifies the argument too much. Yes, over consumption of pop or any highly sweet drink or food is having an adverse effect on many people. But just because it is widespread doesn't make it a public issue because not everyone is effected by the behavior. Whereas we all suffer the effects of bad drinking water or poor air quality, only those who choose to do so suffer from over-consumption of pop. This issue may be widespread, but it is simply not a public-health issue, and therefore the government has no business making laws regarding it. 

Here I've explained the opposition's point, and then I showed how it doesn't work. That's how you have to deal with a counter-argument. And remember, the only point of doing that is to help YOUR argument. You're better off not dealing with a counter-argument at all than to present one and leave it intact.


7. Write a persuasive essay on the following prompt:

It’s been proposed in your school district that students in grades 8 through 12 be separated into classrooms by sex. Proponents believe that this will allow students to focus better on their schoolwork. Opponents feel that such measures would fail to prepare students for the real world. In your essay, take a position on the issue. You may write about either of the two points of view, or you may propose a different point of view. Use specific reasons and examples to support your position.)

[In the last years gender itself has become a debatable issue (for some), for our purposes, you may ignore the whole gender confusion madness and simply deal with the idea of separating boys and girls.]  



(IT'S ALL DUE BY 5:00 pm FRIDAY.) 


HAVE A GREAT WEEK!







Monday, January 22, 2024

WEEK 1

WELCOME to our first class!


Read this first (even if you think you know it already; there's new info here):

GOOGLE DOCS REVIEW...
There are three parts to your doc: the spreadsheet at the top, a section to keep essay drafts, and a section for other work. Let's look at each one:

SPREADSHEET. This where I'll put your grade for essays and weekly work. Keep an eye on this. I update it every week. And read my comments! 

ESSAYS. This section is for essays only. Paragraphs are not essays. Keep the essay assignments together (if you have three drafts on the Helmet Law essay, they should all be next to each other with the latest one on top). LABEL the essay with title and draft #, like this: "Helmet Law draft 2". Keep the most recent assignment at the top of the section.

MISC. WORK. Anything that's not a full essay goes here. Labels are even more important for this section, so include, the week and a title, like this: "WEEK 3, Skill Builder 2". Keep the most recent assignments at the top of the section.  


LATE WORK...
If you need more time, you can ask for an extension by Wednesday midnight. After that I'll grade it at half credit. I'll let you do that TWICE. We'll have two "catch-up" weeks, so that should help you stay on top of things. 


YOUR WORK FOR THIS WEEK:

Post all scores in your google doc in the MISC WORK section. Something like this:  Skill Builder 1 - 15/20

1. Review this course description link.

2. Practice set #1 (Vatican City's Wonders) - Go here for directions and review. 

3. Watch this comma video (it will be familiar if you took HSW1; ignore the date). Do this exercise. 

4. Skill Builder #1 (Skip the exercise on p62; Do the exercise on p64) - Go here for directions and review. I've gone to pdf's for most of these exercises. It can be a little tricky going back and forth between the Skill Builder pdf and my video. Just a heads-up; I'm sure you'll figure it out.

5. ACT persuasive essay. 
When you take the ACT, you'll have 40 minutes to read a piece of persuasive writing and write your own essay analyzing it. In order to write a good analysis, you'll need to be familiar with the persuasive form, so that's where we'll start and spend the first half of this course -- in the persuasive (or argumentative) form of discourse.

Here's the assignment: Write a persuasive essay based on this old ACT prompt: 

A few years ago in Michigan, the law was changed making it legal to operate a motorcycle without a helmet. Some argue that this is merely a correction to laws that went beyond the scope of state government. Opponents to the change argue that some laws—including seat-belt laws—are beneficial to the general welfare and therefore should remain in place. Do you agree that safety measures such as helmets and seat-belts should be mandatory? You may address either side of the debate, or you may present a different point of view on the issue. 
  • 500 word minimum (keep the intro and conclusion paragraphs brief: 3 sentences is plenty; just as with any essay, the work — argumentation for this one — should be primarily in the body paragraphs). It's good to begin thinking about this now: try to argue from big principles rather than from particulars. In other words, what principle would lead someone to argue that he should make his own decisions about health rather than the government making those decisions? What principle would lead someone to argue that the government should make these kinds of decisions for us? 


It's all due by 5pm FRIDAY. 


HAVE A GREAT WEEK!